This piece originally appeared in The Right Mix: How Diverse Income Models Influence Giving by the Blackbaud Institute for Philanthropic Impact. Download the full report to learn how to develop a stable, sustainable, and supported organization.
For all the attention paid to how nonprofits raise funds, there is very little public understanding about the practice of fundraising and the various income streams nonprofits rely on. There are widespread notions that fundraising is a necessary evil, or that dollars spent on fundraising are being diverted from the organization’s work. This is a dangerous mischaracterization of the role that fundraising plays in supporting and sustaining the work of the nonprofit sector.
Here’s the truth:
- Nonprofits depend on charitable support. According to the National Center for Charitable Statistics®, charitable donations underwrite 23%—almost a quarter—of all nonprofit expenses; that percentage increases to 51% when you include only those organizations with budgets of $10 million or less. There is no question that without charitable dollars, nonprofit organizations could not fund their missions and work.
- Fundraising is the practice of securing charitable gifts. While it’s true that some donations are made without fundraising outreach, the vast majority of charitable gifts are made by donors as a result of being asked, which makes the practice of fundraising essential for organizations to survive.
- Fundraising is an ongoing and continuous effort. A study by the Urban Institute® and the Association of Fundraising Professionals® found that in a one-year period, 96 donors were lost for every 100 donors gained. In pure dollars, this meant that $4.695 billion new (or increased) dollars were raised to help cover the $4.264 billion lost due to donor attrition.1 To fuel growth, or even to keep pace with current needs, organizations must continue to invest in fundraising efforts to support their programs.
At BoardSource, we understand there are real risks to underinvesting in fundraising, including the possibility of becoming overdependent on a small number of donors. Through the “Measuring Fundraising Effectiveness” framework we created with GuideStar®, BBB Wise Giving Alliance®, and the Association of Fundraising Professionals, we formed a way for nonprofit board and staff members to quantify the risk associated with a lack of diversification—what we refer to as the Dependency Quotient.
It’s a very simple concept that invites organizations to consider this question: What percentage of our operating budget would be left unfunded if we lost our organization’s top five donors?
For some organizations, this question reveals tremendous vulnerability and fragility. Without their top five donors, they would cease to exist. For others, it documents that a change in the giving of one donor—or even five—would be unlikely to create organizational distress.
The defining difference between these two realities is what this report is all about: investing in a smart, strategic, and diversified approach to fundraising.
There is no question that it takes time, effort, and—yes—money to build a strong and resilient fundraising program. But the fact is that investments in fundraising should be made not despite our need to fund our missions and work, but because of it.
Get Updates
Get nonprofit articles, best practice advice, fundraising ideas and invaluable industry reports and webinars delivered for free!
Great points to focus on!! Thank you.
Would love to broaden the horizons, but we are still going through the pains of moving our gift officers to a new way of thinking. Buy-in is tough sometimes.
This is even more relevant in the UK following GDPR and looking ahead to Brexit and (in my sector) the changes to teachers pensions which is going to hit independent schools hard next year.
Great points. Some places I’ve worked, one top donor accounted for 30-50% of the annual giving.
I can’t stress “fundraising is an ongoing and continuous effort” enough! Great points.
Good advice!
Great points!
Some really good points in here!
Thanks for sharing! Great reminders!
What an interesting thought of what would happen if your top 5 donors disappeared. That should motivate us all even more.
Losing your top 5 donors should make everyone pause. Diversify and stop going to the same well.
Always cultivating!
Thank you for sharing. We really do need to think of the ways in which we reach our donors. Change can be hard for those who have been in the fundraising business for awhile, but critical to continued success. Love the line, “What percentage of our operating budget would be left unfunded if we lost our organization’s top five donors?” Very though provoking.
This is a difficult lessons for start-up nonprofits to understand. Fundraising is hard work!
We have been trying to diversify but it is tough when you are so small.
Our percentages are slightly different, but still focused on a narrow band of support.
Ongoing donor cultivation/engagement is a must for any organization that wants to succeed and grow.
Yikes. That question leaves me shaking in my boots.
Excellent focus points!
Nice! This is like a wake-up-call to check on the diversification. Thank you so much!
Great insight!
Really good focus points…losing your top five donors…oh the nightmares
Good article. Thank you!
Thanks for giving me something to think about!
So important!
Interesting and very relevant!
Interesting read, and very relevant to my current office. Thanks!
Yes, this is a question we need to answer!
If we lost our top 5 donors, we would have to lock the doors. It’s a sobering thought. Not only should we see this as important to the work, but also a part of all of our work. While not every staff member may make the ask, all are building relationships and moving forward a mission worth funding.
Thank you for spreading the word that fundraising is not a dirty word!
Great points! The strategy definitely needs to be smart to retain existing donors while acquiring new one. Thank you for sharing!
Thank you for sharing, great points.
This is a great article. A nonprofit can’t rely on the same people to meet the same goals.
Great article, now I’m frightened to look at our Lost Donors compared to New Donors on a dollar to dollar perspective!
This may be a question that is too complex to answer, but I would ask why the large loss to begin with – 96 lost for every 100? Does it have to do with lack of stewardship? Or were these donors that didn’t have a strong affinity to begin with? Just as much as I agree with diversifying, I also think that there needs to be focus on understanding why different donor populations give to our organization and then ensure that we’re meeting their needs in order to retain them.
Thanks for sharing
This is something we started addressing a couple of years ago. We realized that a lot of unrestricted dollars were raised from a small number of donors and those donors were aging.
We now have a growing group of donors that give a yearly major gift that is much more sustainable.
I’ve not thought about it this way. Makes me want to take a deeper dive into our database 🙂
What percentage of our operating budget would be left unfunded if we lost our organization’s top five donors? – Interesting question. Also a little frightening.
Great points, thank you!
Thank you for sharing!
Very thought provoking
Such a tough truth. Thank you for sharing!
Wow… calculating what percent our top 5 donors represent of all our donors (.1%) and then calculating how much of our total individual funds received was both eye-opening and scary. Thank you for this perspective that will definitely shape our fundraising plan moving forward.